Asus ROG STRIX Z370-H GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics16% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive277% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z370-H GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180914
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 21 '19 at 06:48
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$155
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 96.9
1-Core 160
2-Core 323
105% 193 Pts
4-Core 608
8-Core 923
95% 766 Pts
64-Core 895
55% 895 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 105%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407
CLim: 2340 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.64
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
16% Very poor
Lighting 1.27
Reflection 153
Parallax 12.5
1% 55.7 fps
MRender 26.2
Gravity 0.03
Splatting 114
45% 46.8 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 16%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 571 323 321 320 315 311 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
277% Outstanding
Read 2,390
Write 1,468
Mixed 1,026
SusWrite 360
289% 1,311 MB/s
4K Read 65.8
4K Write 224
4K Mixed 94
339% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 978
DQ Write 1,500
DQ Mixed 1,009
829% 1,163 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 277%
Great: 280%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
541GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 465 474 470 460 472 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 461
Mixed 432
SusWrite 467
104% 460 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 63.1
218% 80.4 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 358
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 132%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$39
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
MC Read 38.4
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 28.2
95% 33.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 28.3
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 50.5
79% 50.5 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z370-H GAMING Builds (Compare 4,127 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-H GAMING - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $943
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback