MSI Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 147%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 143%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics192% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive196% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemMSI MS-7A63
MotherboardMSI Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63)  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180703
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 21 '19 at 05:31
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$379
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Memory 96.7
1-Core 148
2-Core 265
98% 170 Pts
4-Core 526
8-Core 762
83% 644 Pts
64-Core 796
53% 796 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$1,180
MSI(1462 3713) ≥ 4GB; GeForce RTX 2080 Ti SEA HAWK X
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
192% Outstanding
Lighting 684
Reflection 597
Parallax 782
180% 688 fps
MRender 546
Gravity 689
Splatting 331
193% 522 fps
Poor: 138%
This bench: 192%
Great: 196%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$73
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 814 819 235 148 55 142 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
196% Outstanding
Read 1,328
Write 915
Mixed 871
SusWrite 369
194% 871 MB/s
4K Read 59.8
4K Write 210
4K Mixed 80.5
305% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 329
DQ Write 864
DQ Mixed 221
276% 471 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 196%
Great: 212%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$110
553GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1084 1315 1435 1512 1528 853 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
266% Outstanding
Read 1,410
Write 1,545
Mixed 1,075
SusWrite 1,288
300% 1,330 MB/s
4K Read 60
4K Write 218
4K Mixed 85.3
316% 121 MB/s
DQ Read 636
DQ Write 904
DQ Mixed 270
344% 604 MB/s
Poor: 148%
This bench: 266%
Great: 271%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$140
464GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 485 487 486 486 486 486 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 485
Mixed 406
SusWrite 486
106% 468 MB/s
4K Read 46.9
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 62.9
216% 77.2 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 359
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 133%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$140
65GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 486 487 486 486 457 205 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 480
Mixed 413
SusWrite 434
103% 455 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 63.3
214% 77.5 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 360
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 129%
Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 124 121 124 123 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 116
Write 101
Mixed 58.6
SusWrite 122
73% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 36.9
MC Write 39.3
MC Mixed 31.4
102% 35.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 43.6
SC Mixed 32
93% 32.4 GB/s
Latency 51.5
78% 51.5 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 102%
Great: 111%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63) Builds (Compare 17,612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63) - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $1,244
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $165Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $199Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $240
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback