Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 131%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive123% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 21 '19 at 04:57
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$252
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 95.5
1-Core 158
2-Core 310
103% 188 Pts
4-Core 584
8-Core 1,164
103% 874 Pts
64-Core 1182
73% 1182 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 102%
Great: 105%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6471
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
8.37% Terrible
Lighting 8.7
Reflection 12.7
Parallax 8.81
7% 10.1 fps
MRender 13.1
Gravity 7.8
Splatting 17.3
11% 12.7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.37%
Great: 7%
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Gigabyte(1458 374C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
128% Outstanding
Lighting 176
Reflection 196
Parallax 174
143% 182 fps
MRender 131
Gravity 174
Splatting 129
117% 145 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 128%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
464GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1605 905 494 472 486 506 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
220% Outstanding
Read 1,381
Write 1,527
Mixed 702
SusWrite 745
244% 1,089 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 64.4
230% 87.1 MB/s
DQ Read 896
DQ Write 1,265
DQ Mixed 727
648% 963 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 220%
Great: 254%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
232GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 54 52 55 57 61 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 292 292 292 287 292 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 463
Mixed 375
SusWrite 309
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 46.9
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 62.8
217% 78 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 360
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 123%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 170 171 168 167 170 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 129
Mixed 104
SusWrite 168
105% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
MC Read 35.1
MC Write 35.2
MC Mixed 24.5
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 36.4
SC Mixed 25.4
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 55.5
72% 55.5 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback