Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive209% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus CROSSHAIR VI HERO  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 21 '19 at 04:38
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Memory 75.1
1-Core 114
2-Core 220
76% 136 Pts
4-Core 456
8-Core 883
79% 669 Pts
64-Core 1,257
78% 1,257 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
114% Outstanding
Lighting 146
Reflection 195
Parallax 169
119% 170 fps
MRender 127
Gravity 171
Splatting 130
116% 143 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 114%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 615 298 296 296 295 293 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
209% Outstanding
Read 1,939
Write 1,260
Mixed 647
SusWrite 349
231% 1,049 MB/s
4K Read 57.2
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 56.9
239% 88.3 MB/s
DQ Read 905
DQ Write 811
DQ Mixed 615
528% 777 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 209%
Great: 236%
OCZ ARC 100 480GB-$70
74GB free
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 256 374 307 350 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
71% Very good
Read 216
Write 244
Mixed 248
SusWrite 321
58% 257 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 77.8
4K Mixed 27.9
107% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 302
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 163
138% 206 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 71%
Great: 101%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 25 25 26 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 127
Write 118
Mixed 80.4
SusWrite 26.2
65% 87.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
169% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 106%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 376GB
168GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 26 24 26 27 27 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 128
Write 92.4
Mixed 88.2
SusWrite 26.3
62% 83.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
220% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 92%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 859GB
498GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 42 26 44 32 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 142
Write 132
Mixed 97.9
SusWrite 35.5
76% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
222% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 111%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 537GB
365GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 48 26 38 31 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 137
Write 130
Mixed 83
SusWrite 36.4
71% 96.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 44.4
MC Write 40.7
MC Mixed 35.3
115% 40.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 28.7
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 90.2
44% 90.2 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CROSSHAIR VI HERO Builds (Compare 1,742 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO - $227

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $855
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback