TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive59.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DANA_MB
Memory3.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 21 '19 at 03:59
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Memory 62.2
1-Core 52.5
2-Core 82.2
42% 65.6 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 294
32% 252 Pts
64-Core 466
29% 466 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑
This bench: 50.3%
 Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2001) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6169
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.02% Terrible
Lighting 7.37
Reflection 65.5
Parallax 7.31
6% 26.7 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 14.6
9% 10.5 fps
Poor: 4% ↑
This bench: 7.02%
 Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV6-8Q128 128GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2871302
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 92 96 96 97 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 440
Write 95.5
Mixed 140
SusWrite 95.3
42% 193 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 55.7
4K Mixed 25.4
93% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 97.4
DQ Mixed 119
100% 150 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑
This bench: 59.5%
 Great: 85%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
806GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 111 103 102 107 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 23.2
Write 30.7
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 105
35% 47.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.3
120% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑
This bench: 37.2%
 Great: 71%
WD My Passport 259F 1TB
473GB free, PID 259f
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 91 90 90 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 78.7
Write 85.2
Mixed 32
SusWrite 90.1
96% 71.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑
This bench: 34.8%
 Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
68.1% Good
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 22.7
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 8.1
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 57% ↑
This bench: 68.1%
 Great: 84%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,026 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples2,060x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples1,070x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples469x
GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples1,447x
RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 79%, 10,818 samples596x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples398x
SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples816x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples287x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples248x
RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples1,754x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples371x
M471A5244BB0-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 2,214 samples290x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback