Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD4P

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	30.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD4P (all builds)
Memory	3.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110128
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	May 20 '19 at 23:47
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	67.9% Good	Memory 92.8 1-Core 67.3 2-Core 127 61% 95.8 Pts	4-Core 235 8-Core 334 36% 285 Pts	64-Core 340 21% 340 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3732) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 418.81 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	30.7% Below average	Lighting 38.1 Reflection 30.2 Parallax 36.8 31% 35 fps	MRender 38.5 Gravity 37.4 Splatting 35.3 30% 37.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB 31,052 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 113GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 145 67 64 52 42 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	66.7% Good	Read 261 Write 248 Mixed 213 SusWrite 100 46% 206 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 61.1 4K Mixed 40.8 132% 44.4 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 198 149% 198 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 123%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 8GB free Firmware: DXT07B0Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 247 Write 170 Mixed 143 41% 187 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 59 4K Mixed 22.8 99% 35.7 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 134 DQ Mixed 52.3 70% 130 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 85%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89 48,059 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 4GB free Firmware: 1AG01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 51 49 50 50 50 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	27.9% Poor	Read 46.7 Write 55.5 Mixed 36.7 SusWrite 50.3 35% 47.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x2GB 45,030 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 3 of 6 slots used 6GB DIMM Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	44.1% Average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 12.1 MC Mixed 17 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 10.8 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 62.5 64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-EX58-UD4P Builds (Compare 166 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD4P

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	115x
Xeon W3690Intel $990Bench 77%, 4,808 samples	14x
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	8x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	14x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	12x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	11x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	34x
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	21x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $320

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16