Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	23.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	70.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104 181,631 User benchmarks, average bench 60% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	70.2% Very good	Memory 68.7 1-Core 99.4 2-Core 208 69% 125 Pts	4-Core 414 8-Core 411 55% 412 Pts	64-Core 425 26% 425 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 6970 9,594 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Sapphire(174B E284) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	23.2% Poor	Lighting 30.8 Reflection 21.7 Parallax 24.6 25% 25.7 fps	MRender 19.9 Gravity 23.2 Splatting 26.7 19% 23.3 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 22%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force GT 120GB-$155 13,464 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 122 138 136 136 131 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	70.2% Very good	Read 402 Write 146 Mixed 204 SusWrite 133 49% 221 MB/s	4K Read 28.5 4K Write 69.7 4K Mixed 34.8 125% 44.3 MB/s	DQ Read 188 DQ Write 149 DQ Mixed 158 121% 165 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SP008GBLFU240B02 2x8GB 1,193 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	80.7% Excellent	MC Read 30.1 MC Write 30.6 MC Mixed 28.1 85% 29.6 GB/s	SC Read 18.6 SC Write 30 SC Mixed 21.8 67% 23.5 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 89%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 45%

Speed boat

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

SSD
NVMe SSD 250GBNetacBench 197%, 691 samples	4x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	2x
Smartbuy 120GBSSDBench 66%, 1,828 samples	2x

RAM
Vengeance RGB DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBCorsair $379Bench 82%, 7,634 samples	4x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	3x
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 80%, 29,586 samples	3x

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $634

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16