Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 9

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	82.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	98.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 9 (all builds)
Memory	27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	3840 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181210
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 20 '19 at 18:26
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	51%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$252 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	40.1% Average	Memory 46.5 1-Core 26.7 2-Core 51.9 27% 41.7 Pts	4-Core 180 8-Core 535 39% 358 Pts	64-Core 1108 69% 1108 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% EVGA(3842 2281) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.64 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	82.3% Excellent	Lighting 55.3 Reflection 135 Parallax 215 45% 135 fps	MRender 259 Gravity 200 Splatting 134 155% 198 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme WDC WDS512G1X0C- 512GB 926 User benchmarks, average bench 127% 395GB free (System drive) Firmware: B35900WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 354 380 381 359 380 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	98.7% Outstanding	Read 780 Write 743 Mixed 435 SusWrite 368 130% 582 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 29.8 4K Mixed 25.1 80% 25.4 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 518 DQ Mixed 325 280% 409 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 98.7% Great: 153%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 4TB 1,422 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 3TB free Firmware: 1.0.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 725 1274 1713 1950 2004 1997 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	246% Outstanding	Read 2,033 Write 1,449 Mixed 1,768 SusWrite 1,610 385% 1,715 MB/s	4K Read 37.7 4K Write 38.4 4K Mixed 31 117% 35.7 MB/s	DQ Read 595 DQ Write 809 DQ Mixed 402 387% 602 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 246% Great: 565%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2C3000C15 2x16GB 7,847 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	56.4% Above average	MC Read 18.9 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 28.9 62% 21.6 GB/s	SC Read 19.9 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 8.8 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 174 23% 174 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z390 Phantom Gaming 9 Builds (Compare 323 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 153%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 152%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 9

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $412Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	161x
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	72x
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	29x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	38x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	26x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	25x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	15x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $46Bench 234%, 87,206 samples	15x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	14x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C17 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 5,888 samples	14x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 112%, 4,962 samples	14x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $127Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $1,011

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16