Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	47.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	76.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus EX-A320M-GAMING (all builds)
Memory	5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180122
Uptime	1.7 Days
Run Date	May 20 '19 at 15:42
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X-$102 38,959 User benchmarks, average bench 65% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	73.9% Very good	Memory 73.2 1-Core 116 2-Core 226 76% 138 Pts	4-Core 432 8-Core 424 58% 428 Pts	64-Core 448 28% 448 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB; Sapphire Nitro+ RX 570 4GB CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.5.1 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	47.6% Average	Lighting 58.5 Reflection 64.7 Parallax 80.2 48% 67.8 fps	MRender 64.1 Gravity 57.4 Splatting 53.7 47% 58.4 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03070009 SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 114 56 56 60 59 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	76.4% Very good	Read 482 Write 297 Mixed 312 SusWrite 91.7 66% 296 MB/s	4K Read 36.5 4K Write 66.7 4K Mixed 42.8 146% 48.7 MB/s	DQ Read 153 DQ Write 125 DQ Mixed 116 93% 131 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 85%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 417GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 159 174 174 174 174 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	90.7% Outstanding	Read 147 Write 155 Mixed 35.5 SusWrite 169 92% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.5 127% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 90.7% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x4GB-$30 19,452 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (84^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	81.1% Excellent	MC Read 30.5 MC Write 30.4 MC Mixed 27.5 84% 29.5 GB/s	SC Read 20.4 SC Write 29.2 SC Mixed 23.2 69% 24.3 GB/s	Latency 94.1 42% 94.1 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 81.1% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EX-A320M-GAMING Builds (Compare 1,222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	165x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	156x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	95x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	93x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	91x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	60x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	54x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	34x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	32x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 82%, 52,667 samples	46x
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 80%, 29,586 samples	33x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $242

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16