| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 275% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | PC OctaneV 15 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | CLEVO P7xxTM1 |
| Memory | 27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180917 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 20 '19 at 13:19 |
| Run Duration | 124 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 13% |
PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
68.3%
Good
|
70% 121 Pts
|
48% 384 Pts
|
40% 642 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 7510) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.64
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
18.3%
Very poor
|
8% 25.3 fps
|
38% 40.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$234
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1509 1833 1580 1155 1201 1209 MB/s
|
275%
Outstanding
|
383% 1,711 MB/s
|
214% 74.5 MB/s
|
485% 710 MB/s
|
|
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
985GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 109 106 108 103 108 MB/s
|
49.1%
Average
|
62% 85.2 MB/s
|
168% 1.9 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair CM4X16GE2400C16S4 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
75.1%
Very good
|
78% 27.3 GB/s
|
60% 21.1 GB/s
|
47% 85.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical OctaneV 15 Builds (Compare 3 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: PC OctaneV 15
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 2x |
| Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples | 2x |
| GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 75% - Very good | Total price: $499 |