MSI Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7977
MotherboardMSI Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977)  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180626
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateMay 20 '19 at 02:56
Run Duration421 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Memory 91.4
1-Core 125
2-Core 254
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 605
65% 516 Pts
64-Core 617
38% 617 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
122% Outstanding
Lighting 170
Reflection 189
Parallax 169
138% 176 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 165
Splatting 115
107% 132 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 122%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,948
Write 1,403
Mixed 577
288% 1,310 MB/s
4K Read 50.3
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 56.6
244% 95.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,080
DQ Write 1,026
DQ Mixed 950
741% 1,019 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
102GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 9,126
Write 7,548
Mixed 7,865
1,822% 8,180 MB/s
4K Read 731
4K Write 354
4K Mixed 472
1,900% 519 MB/s
DQ Read 1,748
DQ Write 1,278
DQ Mixed 1,360
1,058% 1,462 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$92
473GB free
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2042 2014 1500 1443 1448 1457 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
356% Outstanding
Read 2,306
Write 2,158
Mixed 1,606
SusWrite 1,651
434% 1,930 MB/s
4K Read 65.7
4K Write 199
4K Mixed 94.9
327% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,451
DQ Write 1313
DQ Mixed 1,327
1,010% 1,364 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 356%
Great: 410%
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$226
103GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 347 247 185 184 184 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 327
Write 331
Mixed 237
SusWrite 249
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 36.3
4K Mixed 23.5
78% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 122
91% 121 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
41GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 117 120 126 121 120 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
70% Good
Read 126
Write 91.5
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 119
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 70%
Great: 113%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78
62GB free
Firmware: FS2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 118 118 120 117 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 109
Write 102
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 116
70% 95.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 109%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
197GB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 152 156 156 156 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 119
Write 137
Mixed 82.7
SusWrite 152
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.6
300% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 94%
Jmicron device 8TB
23GB free
Firmware: 0123
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 121 123 122 119 117 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
67.7% Good
Read 114
Write 122
Mixed 119
SusWrite 120
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
356% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 77%
WD My Passport 25F3 2TB
760GB free, PID 25f3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 368 366 362 366 354 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
337% Outstanding
Read 386
Write 418
Mixed 262
SusWrite 359
482% 356 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 64.2
4K Mixed 34.2
3,436% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 29.4
DQ Write 86.5
DQ Mixed 32.5
4,157% 49.5 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 337%
Great: 349%
Lexar 1TB
905GB free, PID 06cf
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 357 360 356 359 349 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
322% Outstanding
Read 542
Write 528
Mixed 458
SusWrite 351
627% 470 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 52.8
4K Mixed 15.1
2,387% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 23.5
DQ Write 63.7
DQ Mixed 22.7
3,026% 36.6 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 322%
Great: 322%
SanDisk Extreme SSD 1TB
5GB free, PID 558c
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 422
Write 420
Mixed 301
480% 381 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 65.9
4K Mixed 35.5
3,529% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 31.6
DQ Write 88.2
DQ Mixed 41.3
4,522% 53.7 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 342%
ADATA SE730H 1TB
69GB free, PID a74a
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 425 418 419 421 432 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
364% Outstanding
Read 467
Write 448
Mixed 408
SusWrite 423
592% 437 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 64.1
4K Mixed 37.2
3,556% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 31.1
DQ Write 85
DQ Mixed 46.5
4,588% 54.2 MB/s
Poor: 354%
This bench: 364%
Great: 381%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.4% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 23.3
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 22.7
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 65.1
62% 65.1 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977) Builds (Compare 4,892 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $601
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback