HP Notebook

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5.32% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	42% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP Notebook (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 81FA
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180411
Uptime	2.7 Days
Run Date	May 20 '19 at 02:44
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-9600P APU (2016 M.BR) 13,243 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	41.9% Average	Memory 63.9 1-Core 60.5 2-Core 98 46% 74.1 Pts	4-Core 118 8-Core 116 16% 117 Pts	64-Core 156 10% 156 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics 6,195 User benchmarks, average bench 4% HP(103C 81FA) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	5.32% Terrible	Lighting 6.13 Reflection 9.23 Parallax 8.59 5% 7.99 fps	MRender 7.05 Gravity 5.87 Splatting 8.39 6% 7.1 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 5.32% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: 525ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 85 86 80 81 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	42% Average	Read 109 Write 95.1 Mixed 93 SusWrite 82.7 21% 95 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 59.9 4K Mixed 24.1 91% 34.2 MB/s	DQ Read 114 DQ Write 96.6 DQ Mixed 83.3 68% 97.8 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 73%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB 431 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 904GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 35 37 37 33 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	18% Very poor	Read 30.8 Write 31.6 Mixed 20.9 SusWrite 34.9 40% 29.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 20%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 15,101 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 21GB free, PID a200 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 27 27 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	13.5% Very poor	Read 24.7 Write 26.6 Mixed 19.4 SusWrite 25.5 33% 24.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5143EB0-CPB 2x4GB 5,514 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34.5% Below average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 7.8 MC Mixed 14.7 36% 12.6 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 8.5 21% 7.37 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 74%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Notebook Builds (Compare 7,801 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

CPU
Core i5-6200UIntelBench 41%, 135,462 samples	1,142x
Core i3-5005UIntelBench 38%, 50,603 samples	1,029x
Core i5-7200UIntelBench 45%, 205,332 samples	983x

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	2,491x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	1,734x
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	1,180x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	248x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	152x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	150x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	399x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	377x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	340x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16