Lenovo 20378

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20378  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo Y50-70
Memory9.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150812
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 20 '19 at 01:58
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 86.9
1-Core 104
2-Core 203
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 455
50% 398 Pts
64-Core 454
28% 454 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 860M
Legend(17AA 3978) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Lighting 21.2
Reflection 16.1
Parallax 18.8
17% 18.7 fps
MRender 24.1
Gravity 21
Splatting 15.8
16% 20.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 545s Series 512GB-$95
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LHF004C
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,240
Write 67
Mixed 130
308% 1,479 MB/s
4K Read 551
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 8.2
848% 188 MB/s
Poor: 76% Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 Kingston ACR16D3LS1KFG/8G 12GB
1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 10.5
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 10.8
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 41%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20378 Builds (Compare 2,814 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20378

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback