Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive63.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX504GM
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 20 '19 at 00:27
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 123
2-Core 230
81% 145 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 648
65% 528 Pts
64-Core 661
41% 661 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 1391) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.5018
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.29% Terrible
Lighting 5.43
Reflection 63.9
Parallax 5.84
4% 25.1 fps
MRender 9.24
Gravity 5.33
Splatting 10.3
7% 8.29 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.29%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3256GJ 256GB
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 126 105 43 104 51 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 378
Write 260
Mixed 281
SusWrite 108
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 55.4
4K Mixed 30.8
113% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 41.5
DQ Mixed 31.4
55% 114 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 79%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
720GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 423 451 438 433 435 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 416
Mixed 385
SusWrite 435
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 66.3
4K Mixed 36.6
123% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 324
244% 328 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 8502 2400 C15 Series 16GB
2667, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.3% Good
MC Read 23.9
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 19.1
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 18.9
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM Builds (Compare 1,213 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback