MSI H110M GAMING (MS-7994)

Performance Results


Gaming 66% Battle cruiser	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 52% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	83.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	MSI MS-7994
Motherboard	MSI H110M GAMING (MS-7994) (all builds)
Memory	9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160224
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	May 19 '19 at 22:18
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	20%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6600K-$81 342,244 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	75.5% Very good	Memory 80 1-Core 108 2-Core 219 76% 136 Pts	4-Core 410 8-Core 413 55% 412 Pts	64-Core 419 26% 419 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3701) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.64 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	83.7% Excellent	Lighting 105 Reflection 112 Parallax 93.9 86% 104 fps	MRender 94.2 Gravity 98.5 Splatting 98.7 80% 97.1 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 83.7% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 52GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 80 81 83 79 80 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 469 Write 448 Mixed 372 SusWrite 114 78% 351 MB/s	4K Read 42.7 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 56.3 193% 68.3 MB/s	DQ Read 364 DQ Write 302 DQ Mixed 332 249% 333 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 354GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 107 111 116 116 110 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	81.6% Excellent	Read 172 Write 163 Mixed 111 SusWrite 112 103% 140 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.1 230% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial Ballistix Sport LT DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB-$118 9,846 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69.6% Good	MC Read 24.8 MC Write 27.1 MC Mixed 23.1 71% 25 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 25.3 SC Mixed 20.1 57% 20 GB/s	Latency 80.6 50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M GAMING (MS-7994) Builds (Compare 1,870 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H110M GAMING (MS-7994)

CPU
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	363x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	178x
Core i5-6600KIntel $81Bench 72%, 342,244 samples	153x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	238x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	236x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	149x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	66x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	62x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	45x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	60x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	49x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	42x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $272

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16