Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI

Performance Results


Gaming 71% Battleship	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 72% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	81.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	237% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI (all builds)
Memory	25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180919
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 19 '19 at 18:09
Run Duration	278 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	79.7% Very good	Memory 75.3 1-Core 112 2-Core 228 76% 139 Pts	4-Core 451 8-Core 861 78% 656 Pts	64-Core 1,229 76% 1,229 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% PNY(196E 11A0) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2047 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.64 Performing below potential (69^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	81.5% Excellent	Lighting 102 Reflection 111 Parallax 103 83% 105 fps	MRender 97.7 Gravity 95.5 Splatting 93.8 78% 95.7 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$79 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 228GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 936 669 668 666 665 653 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	237% Outstanding	Read 2,353 Write 2,013 Mixed 1,406 SusWrite 709 361% 1,620 MB/s	4K Read 56.5 4K Write 114 4K Mixed 72.7 239% 81.1 MB/s	DQ Read 618 DQ Write 499 DQ Mixed 560 419% 559 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 237% Great: 340%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$175 24,007 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 279GB free Firmware: 0C3FD6SD SusWrite @10s intervals: 546 441 282 299 329 301 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 50% Great: 92%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 113 115 115 113 115 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	61.7% Good	Read 102 Write 102 Mixed 56.8 SusWrite 113 68% 93.4 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 182% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 84%
WD Purple Surveillance 2TB (2017)-$70 11,781 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 953GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 132 133 133 134 131 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	73.1% Very good	Read 122 Write 123 Mixed 63.7 SusWrite 132 81% 110 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 104%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 122 121 121 122 121 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	69.2% Good	Read 122 Write 125 Mixed 76.2 SusWrite 119 81% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 186% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 87%
Corsair Voyager VEGA 124GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 110GB free, PID 1a14 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 50 55 49 53 52 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	31.5% Below average	Read 117 Write 77.7 Mixed 9 SusWrite 49.2 74% 63.2 MB/s	4K Read 5.9 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1.3 93% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 33%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 775GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 36 37 37 37 37 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	19.9% Very poor	Read 36.5 Write 35.5 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 36.4 46% 34.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 98% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 44%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 9,084 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 700GB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 85 87 85 86 87 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	37.8% Below average	Read 87.5 Write 88.2 Mixed 31 SusWrite 86.4 97% 73.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB 3,365 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	91.4% Outstanding	MC Read 36.1 MC Write 31.9 MC Mixed 31.3 94% 33.1 GB/s	SC Read 22.9 SC Write 35.2 SC Mixed 26.9 81% 28.3 GB/s	Latency 89.7 45% 89.7 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 91.4% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 1,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 97%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 95%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI - $276

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	424x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $185Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	91x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	52x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	79x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	63x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $79Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	54x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	43x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	41x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	55x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	38x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	34x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $1,104

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16