| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 61.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 94.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock H270 Pro4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170515 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | May 19 '19 at 17:20 |
| Run Duration | 150 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 31% |
PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
84.5%
Excellent
|
84% 147 Pts
|
67% 543 Pts
|
39% 637 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.64
|
61.6%
Good
|
62% 73.5 fps
|
60% 73.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$129
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 393 401 389 381 374 MB/s
|
94.3%
Outstanding
|
81% 358 MB/s
|
126% 48.5 MB/s
|
233% 331 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Expansion+ 4TB
171GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 134 132 134 131 117 MB/s
|
56.7%
Above average
|
72% 97.7 MB/s
|
184% 1.77 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate M3 Portable 4TB
113GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 87 75 64 69 78 MB/s
|
27%
Poor
|
39% 53.4 MB/s
|
203% 1.87 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown IR2400D464L17S/8G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
43.4%
Average
|
40% 14.1 GB/s
|
42% 14.8 GB/s
|
61% 65.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H270 Pro4 Builds (Compare 551 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H270 Pro4 - $295
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 103x |
| Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples | 93x |
| Core i7-7700KIntel $250Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 73x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 87x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 60x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 38x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $679 |