Asus FX503VM

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Jet ski	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	45.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus FX503VM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX503VM
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190119
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 19 '19 at 15:01
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	16%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7300HQ 170,871 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	74.8% Very good	Memory 87.2 1-Core 105 2-Core 193 75% 128 Pts	4-Core 364 8-Core 354 48% 359 Pts	64-Core 355 22% 355 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Asus(1043 154E) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 399.24 Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.9% Average	Lighting 53.2 Reflection 65.1 Parallax 52.3 43% 56.9 fps	MRender 67 Gravity 54.3 Splatting 64.3 51% 61.9 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W128G1002 128GB 3,521 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 35GB free (System drive) Firmware: X6103002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 114 114 115 116 98 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	69.5% Good	Read 443 Write 159 Mixed 213 SusWrite 117 51% 233 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 58.7 4K Mixed 35.9 105% 37.7 MB/s	DQ Read 304 DQ Write 194 DQ Mixed 239 181% 246 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 85%
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120 39,518 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 19GB free Firmware: SAFM00.r Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 354 Write 380 Mixed 266 74% 333 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 60.3 4K Mixed 22.5 88% 33.6 MB/s	DQ Read 359 DQ Write 326 DQ Mixed 66.8 126% 251 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC Kingston 99U5624-001.A00G 16GB 177 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.9% Very good	MC Read 28 MC Write 30.8 MC Mixed 22.9 78% 27.2 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 30.9 SC Mixed 24.3 68% 23.7 GB/s	Latency 70.3 57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 74%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FX503VM Builds (Compare 398 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

System: Asus FX503VM

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	205x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	193x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	397x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	1x

SSD
SD8SN8U128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 65%, 7,802 samples	66x
SD9SN8W128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 66%, 3,521 samples	45x
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	44x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	77x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	65x
76.D305G.D390B 1x16GBUnknownBench 41%, 6,956 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16