Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	22.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 630 7,197 User benchmarks, average bench 45% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	47.8% Average	Memory 71.9 1-Core 22.3 2-Core 46.9 34% 47 Pts	4-Core 138 8-Core 152 19% 145 Pts	64-Core 135 8% 135 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS 18,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Zotac(19DA 5044) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.54% Terrible	Lighting 0.63 Reflection 1.15 Parallax 0.31 0% 0.7 fps	MRender 1.19 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 0.74 1% 0.74 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.54% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 120GB 4,995 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0123A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 140 9.3 60 64 8.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	22.9% Poor	Read 338 Write 258 Mixed 260 SusWrite 74.4 52% 232 MB/s	4K Read 11.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.5 18% 4.03 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 81%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Q10A0084 Kingston 99U5458-002.A SH564128FH8N0 SH564128FH8N0 12GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 667, 667, 667, 667 MHz 2048, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	28.7% Poor	MC Read 12.3 MC Write 6.5 MC Mixed 10.7 28% 9.83 GB/s	SC Read 7.4 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 7.8 21% 7.3 GB/s	Latency 97.1 41% 97.1 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 30%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

CPU
FX-4130 Quad-CoreAMD $150Bench 52%, 8,564 samples	19x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	15x
FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples	4x

SSD
BX500 960GBCrucial $54Bench 69%, 11,103 samples	3x
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	2x
840 120GBSamsung $109Bench 61%, 51,792 samples	2x

RAM
M378B1G73QH0- 1x8GBSamsungBench 26%, 102 samples	10x
M378B1G73QH0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 43%, 86 samples	9x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 43%, 4,751 samples	2x

Value: 35% - Below average

Total price: $407

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16