Asrock FM2A68M-HD+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A68M-HD+  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160112
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 19 '19 at 14:41
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 860K-$51
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Memory 76
1-Core 74.4
2-Core 139
58% 96.5 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 198
28% 208 Pts
64-Core 217
13% 217 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Lighting 34.2
Reflection 24.9
Parallax 30.9
28% 30 fps
MRender 37
Gravity 32.9
Splatting 31.7
27% 33.8 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 125 122 119 117 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
71% Very good
Read 479
Write 140
Mixed 180
SusWrite 125
51% 231 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 79.9
4K Mixed 29.1
117% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 146
122% 179 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 71%
Great: 129%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
17GB free
Firmware: MS1OA810
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 108 128 123 118 122 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 118
Write 103
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 117
65% 90.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 103%
Toshiba MK3265GSX H 320GB
35GB free
Firmware: GJ001Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 51 52 50 49 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
29.7% Poor
Read 52.5
Write 49.5
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 50.7
32% 43.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 50%
SanDisk USB Flash Drive 16GB
15GB free, PID 557e
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 5.5 4.6 5.5 4.6 5.5 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 20
Write 11
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 5
13% 11.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 2.1
143% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.8% Below average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 15.3
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 11.5
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 88.4
45% 88.4 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A68M-HD+ Builds (Compare 222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A68M-HD+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $29
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback