Huananzhi X79

Performance Results


Gaming 64% Destroyer	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 58% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	89.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	147% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Huananzhi X79 (all builds)
Memory	28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180906
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 19 '19 at 13:43
Run Duration	192 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2690 0 4,842 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	66.8% Good	Memory 82.4 1-Core 76.4 2-Core 152 62% 104 Pts	4-Core 277 8-Core 533 48% 405 Pts	64-Core 691 43% 691 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 6276) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.39 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	89.4% Excellent	Lighting 113 Reflection 115 Parallax 97.1 92% 108 fps	MRender 98.7 Gravity 104 Splatting 105 84% 102 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 89.4% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Asgard AN2 250NVMe-M.2/80 250GB 433 User benchmarks, average bench 151% 116GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0802C0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 923 949 963 369 116 120 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	147% Outstanding	Read 1,394 Write 935 Mixed 856 SusWrite 573 209% 940 MB/s	4K Read 39 4K Write 91.8 4K Mixed 28.6 144% 53.1 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 388 DQ Mixed 44.9 107% 218 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 147% Great: 203%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 97GB free Firmware: SBFKB1D2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 148 225 244 148 321 MB/s Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.2% Below average	Read 225 Write 85.7 Mixed 78.5 SusWrite 234 35% 156 MB/s	4K Read 13.3 4K Write 19.4 4K Mixed 10.5 44% 14.4 MB/s	DQ Read 14 DQ Write 15.5 DQ Mixed 14.2 11% 14.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 100%
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42 87,912 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 27GB free Firmware: Z22000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 201 199 202 201 198 MB/s Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	51.6% Above average	Read 257 Write 200 Mixed 167 SusWrite 199 46% 206 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 49.6 4K Mixed 12.6 74% 27.6 MB/s	DQ Read 160 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 73.5 83% 140 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 78%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 54 52 54 60 53 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	38.3% Below average	Read 79.2 Write 82.2 Mixed 59.2 SusWrite 54.5 51% 68.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 72% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 150 157 157 156 156 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	90.5% Outstanding	Read 162 Write 118 Mixed 75 SusWrite 154 93% 127 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 90.5% Great: 101%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB 601 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2TB free, PID 3312 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 197 201 201 200 195 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	75.6% Very good	Read 188 Write 148 Mixed 69 SusWrite 197 198% 151 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70BH1- 4x8GB 47 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	80.4% Excellent	MC Read 33 MC Write 33 MC Mixed 28.9 90% 31.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 10.3 SC Mixed 10.1 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 76.2 52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 101%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 664 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 40%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Huananzhi X79

CPU
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples	120x
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples	71x
Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples	66x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	44x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	42x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	39x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
AS2280P4 256GBApacerBench 168%, 1,607 samples	15x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	13x

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 2,611 samples	56x
M393B1K70DH0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 91%, 1,639 samples	46x
M393B1K70QB0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 96%, 634 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $158

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16