Asus N61Jq

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus N61Jq (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK N61Jq
Memory	14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100817
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 19 '19 at 11:28
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 740-$190 13,278 User benchmarks, average bench 54% Socket 989, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.75 GHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	58.5% Above average	Memory 91.6 1-Core 69.1 2-Core 110 59% 90.4 Pts	4-Core 140 8-Core 210 22% 175 Pts	64-Core 216 13% 216 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Mobility Radeon HD 5730 2,535 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 1C22) 1GB Driver: atiu9p64 aticfx64 aticfx64 atiu9pag aticfx32 aticfx32 atiumd64 atidxx64 atidxx64 atiumdag atidxx32 atidxx32 atiumdva atiumd6a atitmm64 Ver. 8.692.1.0 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	4.97% Terrible	Lighting 6.23 Reflection 6.96 Parallax 5.56 5% 6.25 fps	MRender 6.1 Gravity 4.33 Splatting 6.65 5% 5.69 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.97% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240 GB 240GB 24,911 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 157GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF4500RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 21 0.9 38 84 136 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25.4% Poor	Read 225 Write 194 Mixed 161 SusWrite 79.1 37% 165 MB/s	4K Read 11.5 4K Write 15 4K Mixed 7 34% 11.2 MB/s	DQ Read 42.6 DQ Write 19.3 DQ Mixed 29.9 22% 30.6 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 56%
StoreJet Transcend 250GB 53 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 38GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 53 54 54 53 55 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	25.9% Poor	Read 52.3 Write 51.9 Mixed 31.9 SusWrite 53.8 64% 47.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 170%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 80CE M471B1G73DB0-YK0 16GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	40% Below average	MC Read 16 MC Write 11.7 MC Mixed 12.9 39% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 10 SC Mixed 10.7 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 64.7 62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N61Jq Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus N61Jq

CPU
Core i7 Q 720Intel $220Bench 51%, 13,149 samples	65x
Core i7 Q 740Intel $190Bench 54%, 13,278 samples	21x

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 5730AMDBench 4%, 2,535 samples	86x

SSD
Green 120GB (2018)WD $59Bench 43%, 69,933 samples	3x
BX500 480GBCrucial $38Bench 63%, 83,298 samples	3x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x

RAM
ASU1333D3S9DR8/2G 2x2GBKingstonBench 27%, 948 samples	11x
HMT125S6BFR8C-G7 2x2GBHynixBench 24%, 1,873 samples	9x
HMT125S6TFR8C-H9 2x2GBHynixBench 29%, 1,376 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $279

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $185	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16