Packard IMEDIA 8106

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics34.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemPackard IMEDIA 8106  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard PBGL00
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080805
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 19 '19 at 11:13
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom 9550
AM2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
43% Average
Memory 64.8
1-Core 32.4
2-Core 65
36% 54.1 Pts
4-Core 125
8-Core 127
17% 126 Pts
64-Core 128
8% 128 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
AMD(1002 0B00) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.4.1
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.8% Below average
Lighting 45.3
Reflection 29.9
Parallax 56.9
37% 44 fps
MRender 28.5
Gravity 46.2
Splatting 37.3
31% 37.4 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 39%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$35
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 76 77 79 79 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 107
Write 15
Mixed 38.1
SusWrite 76.6
43% 59.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
21.4% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 7.9
21% 7.23 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 6
15% 5.2 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback