Asus M5A99X EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics24.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130410
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 19 '19 at 06:29
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 87.9
1-Core 75.4
2-Core 153
65% 105 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 497
49% 388 Pts
64-Core 491
33% 491 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
MSI(1462 3030) 2GB
CLim: 1080 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.7.1
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
24.7% Poor
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 90.3
Parallax 149
0% 79.8 fps
MRender 64.4
Gravity 95.5
Splatting 93.4
26% 84.4 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 29%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 250GB-$50
201GB free
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 205 205 200 202 201 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 439
Write 383
Mixed 222
SusWrite 205
70% 312 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 58.3
4K Mixed 34.9
111% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 62.4
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 130
97% 124 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 105%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$73
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 93 117 126 139 141 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
73.2% Very good
Read 134
Write 109
Mixed 74
SusWrite 121
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
202% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 108%
Seagate M3 1TB
94GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 59 58 58 59 58 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
25.2% Poor
Read 48.3
Write 83.3
Mixed 40.8
SusWrite 57.3
81% 57.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
82% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
47.1% Average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 15.8
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 12.7
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 52%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical M5A99X EVO Builds (Compare 3,641 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO - $206

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $678
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $165Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $199Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $54
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback