Asrock X399M Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	22.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	94.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X399M Taichi (all builds)
Memory	29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180124
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 18 '19 at 19:17
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1920X-$800 10,440 User benchmarks, average bench 78% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	80.3% Excellent	Memory 75.4 1-Core 122 2-Core 244 80% 147 Pts	4-Core 456 8-Core 912 81% 684 Pts	64-Core 1,874 116% 1,874 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90 64,240 User benchmarks, average bench 20% AMD(1002 0B04) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.4.3 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	22.3% Poor	Lighting 25.8 Reflection 31.4 Parallax 32.2 21% 29.8 fps	MRender 30.2 Gravity 25.6 Splatting 34.1 25% 30 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK512TBN 512GB 2,512 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 373GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0MU031 SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 478 261 244 244 245 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	94.9% Outstanding	Read 423 Write 472 Mixed 383 SusWrite 325 90% 401 MB/s	4K Read 27.6 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 36.6 142% 55.1 MB/s	DQ Read 334 DQ Write 325 DQ Mixed 325 245% 328 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 94.9% Great: 101%
Crucial_ CT250MX200SSD1 250GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 168% 130GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 243 236 243 244 238 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	172% Outstanding	Read 241 Write 242 Mixed 228 SusWrite 241 326% 238 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 26 4K Mixed 21.3 1,679% 22.1 MB/s	DQ Read 20.8 DQ Write 38.8 DQ Mixed 26.1 2,285% 28.6 MB/s
Poor: 149% ↑ This bench: 172% Great: 195%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C15 4x8GB 266 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	175% Outstanding	MC Read 69.2 MC Write 76.9 MC Mixed 62.6 199% 69.6 GB/s	SC Read 19.3 SC Write 44.7 SC Mixed 27.8 87% 30.6 GB/s	Latency 89.6 45% 89.6 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 175% Great: 166%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X399M Taichi Builds (Compare 126 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 144%

UFO

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 175%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399M Taichi

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	47x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	27x
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $1,075Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	16x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	7x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	7x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	7x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	9x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	6x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	6x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	7x
D4U0836144B 4x8GBUnknownBench 137%, 50 samples	4x
HMA82GU6CJR8N-VK 2x16GBHynixBench 84%, 1,261 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $1,006

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16