Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo P8700-$42 7,366 User benchmarks, average bench 37% Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	34.9% Below average	Memory 59.6 1-Core 31.3 2-Core 53 33% 48 Pts	4-Core 61.5 8-Core 67.1 8% 64.3 Pts	64-Core 63.3 4% 63.3 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family 23,924 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Dell(1028 0263) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.43% Terrible	Lighting 0.53 Reflection 0.46 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.5 fps	MRender 0.43 Gravity 0.37 Splatting 0.65 0% 0.48 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.43% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 160GB-$149 13,029 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4PC10365 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 153 145 118 136 138 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	32.4% Below average	Read 167 Write 130 Mixed 124 SusWrite 138 31% 140 MB/s	4K Read 11.1 4K Write 18.9 4K Mixed 11.9 42% 14 MB/s	DQ Read 129 DQ Write 64.6 DQ Mixed 63.1 56% 85.7 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 51%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB 21,039 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 855GB free Firmware: 0108 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Read 25.9 Write 22.3 Mixed 12.3 SusWrite 28 16% 22.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.2 100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	15.3% Very poor	MC Read 5.6 MC Write 5 MC Mixed 4.6 14% 5.07 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 3.4 10% 3.33 GB/s	Latency 129 31% 129 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16