PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 18.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-P35C-DS3R (all builds) |
Memory | 1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20070907 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | May 18 '19 at 17:48 |
Run Duration | 123 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5405
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
|
43.3%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD HD 7790
Sapphire(174B E253) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 12.101.2.0
|
18.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hitachi HDS728080PLA380 82GB-$33
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PF2OA6BA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 6.6 6.8 17 6.3 5.9 MB/s
|
17%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
390GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 57 60 64 57 62 MB/s
|
34.4%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4GB
null MHz
1024, 2048, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
16.5%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 9x |
Core2 Duo E6750IntelBench 38%, 9,456 samples | 8x |
Core2 Quad Q9400Intel $170Bench 46%, 24,176 samples | 6x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 6x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 5x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $211 |