Cisco N20-B6625-1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive60.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemCisco N20-B6625-1  (all builds)
MotherboardCisco N20-B6625-1
Memory47.1 GB free of 96 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150811
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 18 '19 at 15:17
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User prodigyjon
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5675
CPU1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 79.1
2-Core 159
66% 109 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 530
50% 414 Pts
64-Core 884
55% 884 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Citrix Virtual Hard Disk 42GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 54 75 79 77 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.4% Good
Read 73
Write 30.2
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 47.6
13% 56.7 MB/s
4K Read 48.7
4K Write 49.1
4K Mixed 51.2
165% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 56.9
DQ Write 65.4
DQ Mixed 55.6
43% 59.3 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 57%
Lsilogic Logical Volume 146GB
109GB free
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 11 51 45 53 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 166
Write 52.3
Mixed 19.8
SusWrite 36.1
50% 68.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1
156% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12x8GB
12 of 12 slots used
96GB DIMM
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.1% Average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 16.4
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 6.2
17% 5.83 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback