Notebook W65_67SR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 8.1 is the second most recent version of Windows but it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemNotebook W65_67SR  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook W65_67SR
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20131205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '19 at 10:14
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-4800MQ-$495
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 70.9
2-Core 142
63% 100 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 366
41% 313 Pts
64-Core 372
25% 372 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Clevo(1558 0650) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.5067
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.2% Terrible
Lighting 13.2
Reflection 21.9
Parallax 24.4
4% 19.8 fps
MRender 20.6
Gravity 7.9
Splatting 20.5
3% 16.3 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.2%
Great: 3%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo mSATA 250GB-$299
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT43B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 93 88 95 89 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 479
Mixed 381
SusWrite 115
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 94.1
4K Mixed 53.2
181% 63 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 230
208% 318 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 114%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
288GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 78 78 80 79 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
44% Average
Read 74.4
Write 72.5
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 78.7
45% 61.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial CT102464BF160B.C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
54.8% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 16.1
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 18.1
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical W65_67SR Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook W65_67SR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $209
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $199Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $548SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback