Gigabyte GA-AB350M-DS3H V2-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte AB350M-DS3H V2
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AB350M-DS3H V2-CF (all builds)
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181016
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	May 17 '19 at 18:32
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104 181,631 User benchmarks, average bench 60% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	84.1% Excellent	Memory 83.3 1-Core 123 2-Core 247 84% 151 Pts	4-Core 490 8-Core 488 66% 489 Pts	64-Core 489 30% 489 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 84.1% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85EA) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.39 Performing below potential (47^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	123% Outstanding	Lighting 167 Reflection 182 Parallax 167 136% 172 fps	MRender 122 Gravity 172 Splatting 125 113% 140 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59 69,933 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE450000 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 447 Write 289 Mixed 188 68% 308 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 30.7 4K Mixed 18 65% 22 MB/s	DQ Read 103 DQ Write 73 DQ Mixed 29.8 38% 68.7 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 53%
WD WD3000HLHX-01JJPV0 300GB 3,057 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 89GB free Firmware: 04.05G04 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 5,245 Write 37 Mixed 73.8 1,278% 1,785 MB/s	4K Read 552 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 2.7 23,340% 186 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 79%
HUAWEI TF CARD Storage 4GB 103 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 4GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 4.5 4.6 5.1 4 4.6 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	11.3% Very poor	Read 11.3 Write 6.5 Mixed 8 SusWrite 4.8 10% 7.65 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 0.5 113% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 11%
JetFlash TS256MJF2A/120 0GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 0GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 12.8 Write 9.5 Mixed 10.5 14% 10.9 MB/s	4K Read 7.4 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.4 48% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 1% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 2x4GB 38,955 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	MC Read 36.5 MC Write 36.5 MC Mixed 35.5 103% 36.2 GB/s	SC Read 24.8 SC Write 39.8 SC Mixed 26.9 87% 30.5 GB/s	Latency 74.7 54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AB350M-DS3H V2-CF Builds (Compare 1,171 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350M-DS3H V2-CF

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	184x
Ryzen 5 1600AFAMD $97Bench 72%, 52,721 samples	161x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	122x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	101x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	93x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	57x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	71x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	41x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	38x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	43x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	38x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $313

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16