Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	36.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	269% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180419
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 16 '19 at 21:56
Run Duration	484 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	73.5% Very good	Memory 70.7 1-Core 108 2-Core 214 72% 131 Pts	4-Core 410 8-Core 652 65% 531 Pts	64-Core 870 54% 870 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 372A) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	36.6% Below average	Lighting 47.6 Reflection 32.4 Parallax 39.4 39% 39.8 fps	MRender 38.7 Gravity 43.3 Splatting 37.6 32% 39.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Avant 500GB M.2 NVME 500GB 311 User benchmarks, average bench 259% 298GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVN105 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1497 1526 1500 1547 1572 1540 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	269% Outstanding	Read 2,027 Write 1,425 Mixed 1,035 SusWrite 1,530 336% 1,505 MB/s	4K Read 47.6 4K Write 96.4 4K Mixed 67.4 210% 70.5 MB/s	DQ Read 712 DQ Write 571 DQ Mixed 607 464% 630 MB/s
Poor: 155% ↑ This bench: 269% Great: 342%
HP S700 500GB-$60 12,813 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 61GB free Firmware: R0116B1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 119 117 13 104 14 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	66.5% Good	Read 464 Write 410 Mixed 384 SusWrite 133 78% 348 MB/s	4K Read 23.5 4K Write 80.1 4K Mixed 18.1 101% 40.6 MB/s	DQ Read 119 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 25 77% 160 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 100%
TEAML5Lite3D1T 1TB 1,722 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 112GB free Firmware: Q0410A SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 455 434 426 423 427 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 461 Write 434 Mixed 387 SusWrite 436 97% 429 MB/s	4K Read 36.3 4K Write 82.4 4K Mixed 50.2 163% 56.3 MB/s	DQ Read 369 DQ Write 349 DQ Mixed 121 156% 280 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 166 171 173 172 173 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	97% Outstanding	Read 168 Write 120 Mixed 81.3 SusWrite 170 99% 135 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 97% Great: 113%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB 11,776 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 537GB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 174 170 171 177 175 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	70% Good	Read 70.5 Write 79.3 Mixed 62.3 SusWrite 172 70% 96 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 6.7 4K Mixed 0.6 207% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 87%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA200 2TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 652GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 108 109 109 109 109 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	54.2% Above average	Read 162 Write 172 Mixed 41.4 SusWrite 108 156% 121 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.6 102% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 74%
JetFlash Transcend 2GB 787 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.6 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	5.7% Terrible	Read 19 Write 5 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 5.7 10% 8.73 MB/s	4K Read 7.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 27% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.7% Great: 6%
ST1000DM 003-9YN162 1TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 105GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 108 108 109 109 109 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	41.4% Average	Read 99 Write 92 Mixed 84.6 SusWrite 108 131% 95.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 68% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 82%
ST2000DM 001-1CH164 2TB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 855GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 169 170 172 172 172 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	65.1% Good	Read 165 Write 165 Mixed 77.7 SusWrite 171 194% 145 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 66%
TOSHIBA HDWD120 2TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 296GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 114 114 114 114 114 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	52.6% Above average	Read 141 Write 148 Mixed 26 SusWrite 114 139% 107 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.6 102% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 76%
WD My Book 1140 2TB 10,094 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 536GB free, PID 1140 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 82 82 83 83 83 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	36.5% Below average	Read 86.8 Write 90.3 Mixed 67.5 SusWrite 82 111% 81.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 95% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 49%
General UDisk 16GB 4,718 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 13GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 5.7 5.8 5.6 5.6 5.9 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	5.08% Terrible	Read 12 Write 0.2 Mixed 2.3 SusWrite 5.6 5% 5.03 MB/s	4K Read 9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 33% 3 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.08% Great: 9%
Samsung SSD 860 EVO 500G 500GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 202GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 240 239 239 239 239 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	163% Outstanding	Read 229 Write 225 Mixed 222 SusWrite 239 314% 229 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 24 4K Mixed 19.9 1,556% 20.3 MB/s	DQ Read 18.7 DQ Write 33.7 DQ Mixed 23.9 2,028% 25.4 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 163% Great: 163%
Generic Flash Disk 126GB 514 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 100GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 21 21 20 22 22 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	8.78% Terrible	Read 24.5 Write 10.8 Mixed 9.7 SusWrite 20.5 20% 16.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 12% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 8.78% Great: 28%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 1GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 0GB free, PID a777 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 4 4.2 4 4.2 4.1 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	4.92% Terrible	Read 15.9 Write 4 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 4.1 8% 7.05 MB/s	4K Read 7.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 27% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.92% Great: 5%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 114 114 114 114 114 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	45.3% Average	Read 95.6 Write 120 Mixed 67.3 SusWrite 114 137% 99.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 60%
IS817 innostor 2GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 0817 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 4.8 4.5 4.8 4.9 4.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	3.3% Terrible	Read 9.5 Write 4.8 Mixed 6.5 SusWrite 4.7 8% 6.38 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0 13% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.3% Great: 7%
Patriot Memory 64GB 219 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 51GB free, PID 4100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 2.6 2.8 3.4 3.5 2.5 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	2.7% Terrible	Read 6.8 Write 2.3 Mixed 1.8 SusWrite 2.9 4% 3.45 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 17% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.7% Great: 9%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 1GB 74 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 1GB free, PID 0005 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.3 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	4.33% Terrible	Read 11.3 Write 5 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 5.3 8% 6.47 MB/s	4K Read 6.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 24% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.33% Great: 5%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 2666 2OZ 4x8GB 306 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	91.1% Outstanding	MC Read 36.2 MC Write 33.1 MC Mixed 31.3 96% 33.5 GB/s	SC Read 19.7 SC Write 30.8 SC Mixed 28.6 75% 26.4 GB/s	Latency 99.8 40% 99.8 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 91.1% Great: 146%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	215x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)