Asus TUF H370-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics165% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive99.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus TUF H370-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190320
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateMay 16 '19 at 19:57
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-8500-$279
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
1-Core 124
2-Core 247
87% 185 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 707
77% 597 Pts
64-Core 622
42% 622 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$1,100
Gigabyte(1458 37AC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
165% Outstanding
Lighting 618
Reflection 588
Parallax 713
164% 640 fps
MRender 555
Gravity 648
Splatting 323
166% 509 fps
Poor: 73%
This bench: 165%
Great: 184%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HCHP-000L7 256GB
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 272 274 274 276 272 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 294
Mixed 249
SusWrite 273
73% 329 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 97.2
4K Mixed 40
156% 57.5 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 244
207% 303 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 102%
Micron C400 RealSSD 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: 04TH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 50 50 50 50 50 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 409
Write 49.5
Mixed 85.3
SusWrite 49.6
32% 148 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 49.9
4K Mixed 14.5
77% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 49.5
DQ Mixed 23.6
41% 83.5 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 69%
Samsung MZ7LN256HCHP-000L7 256GB
237GB free
Firmware: EMT03L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 294 293 294 295 296 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 295
Mixed 258
SusWrite 294
75% 338 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 98.9
4K Mixed 41.6
163% 59.5 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 243
207% 304 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 103%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
120GB free
Firmware: KC67
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 111 113 112 114 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 116
Write 109
Mixed 63.6
SusWrite 113
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 77%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
227GB free
Firmware: 0707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 99 106 102 108 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 47.8
Write 95
Mixed 82.1
SusWrite 104
61% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.5
132% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
MC Read 34.8
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 24.4
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 32
SC Mixed 26.4
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 60.2
66% 60.2 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 109%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF H370-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 637 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF H370-PRO GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $749
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $137Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210AMD RX 5700 $370Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340AMD RX 590 $186Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback