Asus B150-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics54.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 4 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus B150-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 16 '19 at 19:56
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-6600-$189
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
56.2% Above average
1-Core 104
2-Core 199
72% 151 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 316
38% 284 Pts
64-Core 347
23% 347 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$240
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Lighting 222
Reflection 187
Parallax 203
58% 204 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 200
Splatting 155
55% 166 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 61%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$76
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 223 219 211 199 200 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 463
Write 435
Mixed 364
SusWrite 233
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 94.9
4K Mixed 52.6
174% 61.6 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 314
239% 322 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 102%
Great: 125%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$42
239GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 153 154 152 153 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 146
Mixed 84.3
SusWrite 152
101% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
236% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$47
132GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 126 125 125 125 124 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Read 121
Write 123
Mixed 83
SusWrite 125
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 89%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
169GB free
Firmware: GG2OA7A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 59 59 58 58 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Read 58.2
Write 62.5
Mixed 26
SusWrite 57.8
37% 51.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
88% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 59%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$60
228GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 96 95 96 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 95.5
Write 87.5
Mixed 59.2
SusWrite 96
62% 84.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$60
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
68.2% Good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 21.1
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 24.9
SC Mixed 19.4
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 89%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical B150-PLUS Builds (Compare 596 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus B150-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $502
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $195AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia RTX 2060 $325Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $609SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback