Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 159%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive332% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 16 '19 at 18:30
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-7700K-$359
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
105% Outstanding
SC Int 144
SC Float 153
SC Mixed 146
118% 148 Pts
QC Int 512
QC Float 530
QC Mixed 519
118% 521 Pts
MC Int 691
MC Float 835
MC Mixed 776
114% 767 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$528
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
124% Outstanding
Lighting 387
Reflection 371
Parallax 397
121% 385 fps
MRender 237
Gravity 390
Splatting 242
127% 290 fps
Poor: 60%
This bench: 124%
Great: 138%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$110
306GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1094 869 870 871 870 862 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
332% Outstanding
Read 2,700
Write 2,510
Mixed 1,878
SusWrite 906
447% 1,998 MB/s
4K Read 71
4K Write 189
4K Mixed 99.7
335% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,570
DQ Write 1,329
DQ Mixed 1,422
1,073% 1,440 MB/s
Poor: 202%
This bench: 332%
Great: 335%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$78
98GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 317 317 317 318 317 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 518
Write 498
Mixed 470
SusWrite 339
103% 456 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 67.8
237% 87.6 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 363
273% 366 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 131%
Great: 128%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$97
123GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 493 493 494 494 494 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 518
Write 493
Mixed 382
SusWrite 491
106% 471 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 53.1
200% 76.9 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 347
266% 360 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 129%
Great: 125%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$85
75GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1242 349 288 288 287 286 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 2,051
Write 1,269
Mixed 626
SusWrite 457
243% 1,101 MB/s
4K Read 54.2
4K Write 190
4K Mixed 60.3
260% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1,065
DQ Write 1,158
DQ Mixed 966
767% 1,063 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 237%
Great: 238%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$43
334GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 139 140 142 142 142 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 125
Write 124
Mixed 78
SusWrite 141
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
231% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3866 C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 39.8
MC Write 44
MC Mixed 31.4
110% 38.4 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 44.5
SC Mixed 35.5
93% 32.7 GB/s
Latency 42
95% 42 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 109%
Great: 128%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 2,314 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 - $172

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $1,214
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $350Nvidia GTX 1070 $335Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $144Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $100
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $280Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $646SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $75SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback