Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 155%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics98.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive332% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 16 '19 at 18:30
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-7700K-$334
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
1-Core 146
2-Core 295
103% 221 Pts
4-Core 519
8-Core 778
83% 648 Pts
64-Core 776
52% 776 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$528
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Lighting 387
Reflection 371
Parallax 397
100% 385 fps
MRender 237
Gravity 390
Splatting 242
96% 290 fps
Poor: 85%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 112%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$100
306GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1094 869 870 871 870 862 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
332% Outstanding
Read 2,700
Write 2,510
Mixed 1,878
SusWrite 906
447% 1,998 MB/s
4K Read 71
4K Write 189
4K Mixed 99.7
335% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,570
DQ Write 1,329
DQ Mixed 1,422
1,073% 1,440 MB/s
Poor: 211%
This bench: 332%
Great: 338%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$75
98GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 317 317 317 318 317 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 518
Write 498
Mixed 470
SusWrite 339
103% 456 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 67.8
237% 87.6 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 363
273% 366 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 131%
Great: 131%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$224
123GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 493 493 494 494 494 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 518
Write 493
Mixed 382
SusWrite 491
106% 471 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 53.1
200% 76.9 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 347
266% 360 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 129%
Great: 123%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
75GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1242 349 288 288 287 286 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 2,051
Write 1,269
Mixed 626
SusWrite 457
243% 1,101 MB/s
4K Read 54.2
4K Write 190
4K Mixed 60.3
260% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1,065
DQ Write 1,158
DQ Mixed 966
767% 1,063 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 237%
Great: 238%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$40
334GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 139 140 142 142 142 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 125
Write 124
Mixed 78
SusWrite 141
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
231% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3866 C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 39.8
MC Write 44
MC Mixed 31.4
110% 38.4 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 44.5
SC Mixed 35.5
93% 32.7 GB/s
Latency 42
95% 42 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 109%
Great: 127%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 2,641 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $1,227
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $234Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback