Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 200GE-$57 12,631 User benchmarks, average bench 54% AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	54.3% Above average	Memory 64.2 1-Core 90.1 2-Core 141 58% 98.4 Pts	4-Core 258 8-Core 261 35% 259 Pts	64-Core 250 15% 250 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 61%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 452GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 353 357 358 361 355 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 478 Write 423 Mixed 347 SusWrite 365 91% 403 MB/s	4K Read 32.7 4K Write 80 4K Mixed 39.2 142% 50.6 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 341 DQ Mixed 350 265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 129%
JetFlash Transcend 8GB 9,769 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 3GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 7.6 7.9 7.8 7.6 12 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Read 76 Write 7.2 Mixed 9.3 SusWrite 9.1 23% 25.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 13% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLT4G4D30AETA.K8FE 2x4GB 650 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	76.6% Very good	MC Read 28.3 MC Write 29.6 MC Mixed 26.8 81% 28.2 GB/s	SC Read 18.5 SC Write 26.9 SC Mixed 20.3 63% 21.9 GB/s	Latency 116 34% 116 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 108%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	720x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	499x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	473x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	592x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $38Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	491x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	356x

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $407

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16