Gigabyte GA-B360M D3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive135% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemGigabyte B360M-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B360M D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180301
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMay 16 '19 at 16:01
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i3-8100-$132
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
74.6% Very good
1-Core 111
2-Core 218
77% 164 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 419
58% 423 Pts
64-Core 433
29% 433 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 3767) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Lighting 56.1
Reflection 40.5
Parallax 65.6
15% 54.1 fps
MRender 34
Gravity 55.4
Splatting 46.8
15% 45.4 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 16%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX6000 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB-$40
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V6005-af Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 597 568 600 601 530 213 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 745
Write 603
Mixed 553
SusWrite 518
136% 605 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 53
189% 67.4 MB/s
DQ Read 303
DQ Write 381
DQ Mixed 278
228% 321 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 135%
Great: 138%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$50
311GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 100 102 102 101 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 96.8
Write 102
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 101
64% 87.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 76%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
199GB free
Firmware: 2AR20003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 50 50 50 50 50 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 93.1
Write 13.4
Mixed 21.6
SusWrite 48.2
32% 44.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 60%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
377GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 81 82 82 82 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 85.6
Write 55.7
Mixed 48.1
SusWrite 80.9
50% 67.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 60%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$8
15GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 38 39 39 39 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
21.6% Poor
Read 66.5
Write 61.7
Mixed 61.3
SusWrite 39
76% 57.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
56% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 28%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$4
6GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 17 14 17 14 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
8.2% Terrible
Read 29.4
Write 23.5
Mixed 9
SusWrite 14.7
24% 19.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.2%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2666 C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
77.7% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 30.7
MC Mixed 22.8
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 24.3
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 96%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-B360M D3H-CF Builds (Compare 2,512 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B360M D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $592
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $209Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback