Asus M5A88-V EVO

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	5.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A88-V EVO (all builds)
Memory	14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130416
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 16 '19 at 14:41
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	33%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 960T-$469 4,461 User benchmarks, average bench 54% AM3R2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	59.4% Above average	Memory 89.3 1-Core 53.6 2-Core 107 54% 83.2 Pts	4-Core 171 8-Core 188 24% 180 Pts	64-Core 198 12% 198 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670 32,193 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Sapphire(174B E198) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	5.9% Terrible	Lighting 7.8 Reflection 7.69 Parallax 6.97 6% 7.49 fps	MRender 5.9 Gravity 6.4 Splatting 6.09 5% 6.13 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.9% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 133GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71B1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 43 45 45 45 45 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	38.7% Below average	Read 370 Write 274 Mixed 249 SusWrite 68.6 54% 240 MB/s	4K Read 21.8 4K Write 11.1 4K Mixed 13 56% 15.3 MB/s	DQ Read 124 DQ Write 11.8 DQ Mixed 20.6 27% 52.1 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 100%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB 145,911 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 692GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 164 165 165 163 166 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	82.4% Excellent	Read 123 Write 112 Mixed 67.6 SusWrite 164 85% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 95%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB 14,954 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 931GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 99 92 99 102 103 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	42% Average	Read 99.3 Write 69.9 Mixed 57.8 SusWrite 96.5 107% 80.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34.3% Below average	MC Read 15.6 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 12.6 33% 11.6 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 10 22% 7.8 GB/s	Latency 68.1 59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A88-V EVO Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A88-V EVO

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	13x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	11x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	9x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	9x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	6x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	6x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	4x
MX500 500GBCrucial $55Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	4x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	27x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	22x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $217

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16