Acer AMC605

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive55.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer AMC605  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire MC605
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 16 '19 at 14:33
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User BRN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 89.7
2-Core 167
70% 116 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 330
43% 325 Pts
64-Core 337
21% 337 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 73%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 745 (OEM)-$60
Nvidia(10DE 1065) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
11% Very poor
Lighting 13.8
Reflection 13.1
Parallax 10
11% 12.3 fps
MRender 11.4
Gravity 12.5
Splatting 14.1
10% 12.6 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB-$139
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2306RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 190 202 204 164 237 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.5% Above average
Read 248
Write 240
Mixed 187
SusWrite 201
49% 219 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 39.1
4K Mixed 22.4
81% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 115
106% 164 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 99%
StoreJet Transcend 2TB
7GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 29
Write 25
Mixed 25
SusWrite 13.7
30% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
101% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 52%
BUFFALO HD-PCTU3 1TB
50GB free, PID 01de
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 31.5
Write 25.4
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 13.7
31% 24.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 43%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB
62GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 32.4
Write 24.1
Mixed 24.9
SusWrite 13.6
30% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 45%
USB FLASH DRIVE 32GB
4GB free, PID b113
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 25 26 26 24 26 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 27.5
Write 19.5
Mixed 11
SusWrite 24.7
27% 20.7 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 2.7
177% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391B5273DH0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.7% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 16.4
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AMC605 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Acer AMC605

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $92
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback