Asus X99-E WS

Performance Results


Gaming 128% UFO	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 131% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	144% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	206% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-E WS (all builds)
Memory	50.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180301
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	May 16 '19 at 09:30
Run Duration	222 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6950X-$499 6,135 User benchmarks, average bench 87% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	87.5% Excellent	Memory 88.2 1-Core 114 2-Core 231 81% 144 Pts	4-Core 466 8-Core 888 81% 677 Pts	64-Core 1,489 92% 1,489 Pts
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 87.5% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Asus(1043 8667) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.64 Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	144% Outstanding	Lighting 190 Reflection 216 Parallax 229 155% 212 fps	MRender 243 Gravity 201 Splatting 139 153% 194 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 144% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$690 3,492 User benchmarks, average bench 271% 148GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 486 457 375 355 316 265 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	206% Outstanding	Read 2,367 Write 559 Mixed 638 SusWrite 376 214% 985 MB/s	4K Read 43.6 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 57.8 198% 70.3 MB/s	DQ Read 728 DQ Write 476 DQ Mixed 615 455% 606 MB/s
Poor: 162% ↑ This bench: 206% Great: 354%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 284GB free Firmware: EXM03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 386 372 372 407 369 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 498 Write 454 Mixed 393 SusWrite 375 97% 430 MB/s	4K Read 34.4 4K Write 83.8 4K Mixed 45.4 155% 54.5 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 335 DQ Mixed 349 264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 21GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 492 Write 451 Mixed 413 101% 452 MB/s	4K Read 40.2 4K Write 82.5 4K Mixed 50 169% 57.6 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 281 DQ Mixed 229 198% 296 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Corsair Force 120GB 1,958 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 25GB free Firmware: 2.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 77 81 72 77 72 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	50.8% Above average	Read 154 Write 113 Mixed 118 SusWrite 74.5 26% 115 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 67.9 4K Mixed 31.1 113% 41.3 MB/s	DQ Read 138 DQ Write 92.9 DQ Mixed 98.2 78% 110 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 56%
Hitachi HUH721212ALN600 12TB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 122% 3TB free Firmware: LEGNT3D0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 188 178 171 188 169 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 203 Write 200 Mixed 89.5 SusWrite 179 123% 168 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 1.2 302% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 88% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 137%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$178 20,205 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 244GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 152 142 134 141 119 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	80.8% Excellent	Read 145 Write 142 Mixed 80.8 SusWrite 137 92% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.1 207% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 80.8% Great: 98%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 250GB 159 User benchmarks, average bench 210% 34GB free, PID 61f5 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 280 270 266 288 260 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	257% Outstanding	Read 344 Write 307 Mixed 296 SusWrite 270 408% 304 MB/s	4K Read 28.8 4K Write 46 4K Mixed 33.8 2,821% 36.2 MB/s	DQ Read 33 DQ Write 59.1 DQ Mixed 40 3,493% 44 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 257% Great: 377%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C17 4x16GB 1,664 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	116% Outstanding	MC Read 48.6 MC Write 48.8 MC Mixed 40.9 132% 46.1 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 19.4 SC Mixed 19.4 49% 17.3 GB/s	Latency 69.3 58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 143%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-E WS Builds (Compare 270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 81%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 78%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS - $473

CPU
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	42x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	35x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	28x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	15x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	15x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	15x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	19x
MZ7TE128HMGR-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 62%, 5,980 samples	17x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	8x

RAM
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 34%, 168 samples	17x
M393A2G40EB1-CPB 4x16GBSamsungBench 95%, 199 samples	8x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GBCorsair $154Bench 85%, 8,498 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $1,158

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16