Asus SABERTOOTH X99

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive196% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH X99  (all builds)
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 16 '19 at 04:46
Run Duration267 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-6850K-$400
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
78.4% Very good
1-Core 107
2-Core 236
79% 171 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 688
74% 573 Pts
64-Core 894
60% 894 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$808
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Lighting 555
Reflection 518
Parallax 591
146% 555 fps
MRender 267
Gravity 494
Splatting 293
130% 351 fps
Poor: 119%
This bench: 130%
Great: 146%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$350
320GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1264 669 239 241 342 207 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
196% Outstanding
Read 1,932
Write 1,371
Mixed 726
SusWrite 494
250% 1,131 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 55.2
194% 71.3 MB/s
DQ Read 920
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 440
378% 573 MB/s
Poor: 148%
This bench: 196%
Great: 282%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$87
46GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 439 446 402 186 139 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 470
Mixed 384
SusWrite 342
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 50.1
181% 65.1 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 354
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 112%
Great: 135%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$110
160GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 440 450 453 465 460 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 461
Mixed 454
SusWrite 452
104% 463 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 52.3
180% 64.8 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 357
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 119%
Great: 134%
Seagate ST6000VN0041-2EL11C 6TB
15GB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 148 152 154 162 158 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 29% Great: 108%
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 3TB-$73
224GB free
Firmware: CV27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 114 113 113 113 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 159
Write 166
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 113
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 115%
WD My Passport 0820 2TB
1TB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 101 102 103 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
40% Below average
Read 94
Write 95.5
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 101
117% 86.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 40%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair CMU32GX4M4A2666C16 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 48.3
MC Write 44.5
MC Mixed 39.2
126% 44 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 21.7
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 113%
Great: 113%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical SABERTOOTH X99 Builds (Compare 2,223 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $923
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $260Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $369Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback