Asrock 960GM-VGS3 FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics10.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive39% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsrock 960GM-VGS3 FX  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131002
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 16 '19 at 01:31
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD FX-8320-$163
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
43.5% Average
1-Core 66.3
2-Core 121
45% 93.7 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 439
42% 339 Pts
64-Core 440
30% 440 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Asus(1043 8439) 1GB
CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Lighting 30.9
Reflection 24.6
Parallax 38.3
8% 31.3 fps
MRender 28.8
Gravity 37
Splatting 30.4
10% 32.1 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 11%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$32
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 95 95 92 48 80 MB/s
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39% Below average
Read 207
Write 184
Mixed 172
SusWrite 84
36% 162 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 39.9
4K Mixed 17.9
78% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 26.9
DQ Write 64.8
DQ Mixed 21.9
24% 37.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 39%
Great: 101%
Kingston A400 120GB-$22
8GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 96 97 93 50 82 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33% Below average
Read 180
Write 110
Mixed 111
SusWrite 86.3
27% 122 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 26
4K Mixed 16.7
64% 20.5 MB/s
DQ Read 17.7
DQ Write 29.3
DQ Mixed 21.4
17% 22.8 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 33%
Great: 79%
Drevo X1 SSD 120GB
9GB free
Firmware: Q0831C0
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 234
Write 208
Mixed 23
34% 155 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 11.9
4K Mixed 0.9
36% 10.4 MB/s
DQ Read 55.6
DQ Write 14.6
DQ Mixed 0.8
10% 23.7 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 92%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$8
57GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 6.8 6.8 7.1 7.6 7.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
5.53% Terrible
Read 21.5
Write 6.8
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 7.3
12% 10.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 5.53%
Great: 28%
Mass Storage Device 32GB
21GB free, PID 125d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 17.8
Write 16.6
Mixed 16.5
SusWrite 16.7
23% 16.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 2.6
176% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown CT102464BA1339.M16 Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 16GB
333, 333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
41.7% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 14.1
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 12.2
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 42%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 960GM-VGS3 FX Builds (Compare 2,962 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 960GM-VGS3 FX - $59

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $329
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $195AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia RTX 2060 $325Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $609SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback