Asus P8H67-V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43.2% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-V  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 16 '19 at 01:29
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User IRQ-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i5-2500-$55
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
64.1% Good
SC Int 88.6
SC Float 89.3
SC Mixed 89.3
71% 89.1 Pts
QC Int 331
QC Float 340
QC Mixed 332
76% 334 Pts
MC Int 332
MC Float 334
MC Mixed 327
50% 331 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R9 380-$170
CLim: 985 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.4.3
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
43.2% Average
Lighting 124
Reflection 130
Parallax 162
43% 139 fps
MRender 104
Gravity 117
Splatting 82.9
44% 101 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 48%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Team T253LE120G 120GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM11.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 73 72 51 72 55 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.8% Below average
Read 226
Write 119
Mixed 148
SusWrite 85.1
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 30.7
4K Mixed 20.6
74% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 27.5
DQ Write 47.2
DQ Mixed 28.7
24% 34.5 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 84%
Kingston A400 240GB-$27
25GB free
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 88 53 93 93 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 398
Write 343
Mixed 27
SusWrite 71
46% 210 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 14.5
4K Mixed 10
51% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 29.7
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 25.4
32% 54.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 92%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$61
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 84 49 92 92 47 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 95.5
Write 93.2
Mixed 74.3
SusWrite 69
62% 83 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
30.4% Below average
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 9.2
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 9.4
28% 9.63 GB/s
Latency 95.9
42% 95.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 64%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical P8H67-V Builds (Compare 884 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $338
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $355Nvidia GTX 1070 $380Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $92
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $139Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $208Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $99
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $108Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $93
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $90SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $601SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $77Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $95SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback