HP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemHP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3047h
Memory4.3 GB free of 8.00098 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100804
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 15 '19 at 22:20
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 B95
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
55.9% Above average
Memory 83.8
1-Core 43.6
2-Core 87.2
48% 71.5 Pts
4-Core 165
8-Core 165
22% 165 Pts
64-Core 165
10% 165 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
MSI(1462 8A90) 2GB
CLim: 1203 MHz, MLim: 1755 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.5.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Lighting 17.4
Reflection 28.5
Parallax 20.7
14% 22.2 fps
MRender 28.1
Gravity 16.1
Splatting 34
22% 26.1 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$35
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 40 42 44 51 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 120
Write 118
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 51.7
66% 89.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 69%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
136GB free
Firmware: 0707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 28 28 28 29 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 25.5
Write 28
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 27.3
19% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.3
132% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 66%
Iomega E xternal HD 500GB
102GB free, PID 0370
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 24 24 25 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 23.7
Write 22.8
Mixed 20.2
SusWrite 24.1
31% 22.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:01 98 HP497157-C01-ELDW ID:01 98 HP497157-C01-ELDW ID:01 98 KP223C-ELD ID:01 98 KP223C-ELF 41GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 33792 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
32.7% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 11.9
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 8.1
20% 6.93 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC Builds (Compare 267 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback