Asus X99-E WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics30.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive183% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus X99-E WS  (all builds)
Memory16.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170808
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 15 '19 at 20:40
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 80%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Memory 77.9
1-Core 72.7
2-Core 162
61% 104 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 639
48% 432 Pts
64-Core 1,675
104% 1,675 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.5% Below average
Lighting 37.9
Reflection 29.4
Parallax 39.6
31% 35.6 fps
MRender 37.9
Gravity 36.2
Splatting 35.1
30% 36.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1110 662 655 665 659 661 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
183% Outstanding
Read 1,820
Write 1,645
Mixed 1,353
SusWrite 735
311% 1,388 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 51.6
4K Mixed 47.1
148% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 518
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 417
313% 422 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 183%
Great: 340%
Seagate ST10000NM0016-1T 10TB
8.5TB free
Firmware: SN00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 133 120 117 116 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 123
Write 87
Mixed 66
SusWrite 118
72% 98.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.4
102% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 110%
USB DISK 2.0 8GB
7GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 17
Mixed 2
7% 9.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 9%
SONY WALKMAN 61GB
8GB free, PID 09c0
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 8.9 7.7 9 8.8 8.8 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 17
Write 9
Mixed 10.8
SusWrite 8.7
14% 11.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 3.2
219% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
99.5% Outstanding
MC Read 42.6
MC Write 40
MC Mixed 37.2
114% 39.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 15.9
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 84.6
47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-E WS Builds (Compare 270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS - $473

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,158
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback