Aaeon UP-APL01

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, HDD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.5%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
SystemAaeon UP-APL01  (all builds)
MotherboardAAEON UP-APL01
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180629
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 15 '19 at 19:53
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Celeron N3350
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
23.5% Poor
SC Int 50.3
SC Float 46.9
SC Mixed 49.5
39% 48.9 Pts
QC Int 99.2
QC Float 90.4
QC Mixed 95.1
22% 94.9 Pts
MC Int 97.4
MC Float 92.7
MC Mixed 93.1
14% 94.4 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 24%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4749
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
2.44% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 7.2
Parallax 5.7
2% 6.33 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 9.7
3% 7.17 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.44%
Great: 3%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Generic Flash Disk 4GB
3GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 8.1 7.9 8 7.9 8.2 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.53% Terrible
Read 11.5
Write 6
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 7.9
9% 7.42 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
2% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.53%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x1GB
2 of 3 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
16.4% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 5.3
17% 5.9 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 3.1
10% 3.53 GB/s
Latency 208
19% 208 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 30%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical UP-APL01 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Aaeon UP-APL01

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $355Nvidia GTX 1070 $380Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $92
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $139Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $208Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $99
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $108Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $93
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $90SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $601SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $77Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $95SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback