Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3350 14,922 User benchmarks, average bench 21% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	25.2% Poor	Memory 35.3 1-Core 45.2 2-Core 81.1 31% 53.9 Pts	4-Core 89.6 8-Core 84 12% 86.8 Pts	64-Core 91.6 6% 91.6 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 25.2% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 15,538 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4749 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.88% Terrible	Lighting 2.03 Reflection 2.46 Parallax 1.62 2% 2.04 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 1.83 Splatting 3.35 2% 2.76 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.88% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Generic Flash Disk 4GB 16,068 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 3GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 8.1 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	3.8% Terrible	Read 13.8 Write 5.7 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 7.8 9% 7.88 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 2% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.8% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x1GB 341 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 2 of 3 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16.2% Very poor	MC Read 5.4 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 5.2 17% 5.87 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 3.4 10% 3.57 GB/s	Latency 225 18% 225 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16.2% Great: 30%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16