Foxconn Destroyer

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Foxconn Destroyer (all builds)
Motherboard	FOXCONN Destroyer
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090113
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 15 '19 at 17:29
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom 9550 2,773 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	50.9% Above average	Memory 77 1-Core 36.4 2-Core 73.1 42% 62.2 Pts	4-Core 147 8-Core 146 20% 147 Pts	64-Core 148 9% 148 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Gigabyte(1458 34EF) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.24% Terrible	Lighting 1.23 Reflection 2.65 Parallax 0.53 1% 1.47 fps	MRender 3.52 Gravity 0.87 Splatting 2 2% 2.13 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.24% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: 605ABBF2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 97 96 100 98 102 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	52.9% Above average	Read 215 Write 148 Mixed 162 SusWrite 96.6 35% 155 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 49.6 4K Mixed 31.4 106% 35.6 MB/s	DQ Read 93.8 DQ Write 150 DQ Mixed 120 91% 121 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 73%
Seagate ST3120026AS 120GB-$24 2,225 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 11GB free Firmware: 8.01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 33 33 33 33 33 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	18.5% Very poor	Read 31.3 Write 13 Mixed 21.4 SusWrite 33 18% 24.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.6 103% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 31%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 237GB free Firmware: 1AA01113 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 62 61 58 62 59 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	34.9% Below average	Read 61 Write 48.1 Mixed 49.7 SusWrite 60.1 41% 54.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 180% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 62%
Hitachi HDS722512VLAT80 124GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 28GB free Firmware: V33OA60A SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 33 33 33 33 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	20.9% Poor	Read 39.5 Write 38.6 Mixed 28.8 SusWrite 33.1 26% 35 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 20.9% Great: 28%
Samsung HD322IJ 320GB 527 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 15GB free Firmware: 1AC01113 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 71 71 71 72 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	39.9% Below average	Read 67.4 Write 48.9 Mixed 49.3 SusWrite 71.1 44% 59.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	24.7% Poor	MC Read 9.1 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 9.3 24% 8.23 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 6 16% 5.63 GB/s	Latency 86.3 46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Foxconn Destroyer

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)