Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 120%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics137% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive236% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '19 at 12:33
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-9600K-$196
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Memory 92
1-Core 118
2-Core 227
85% 146 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 582
68% 518 Pts
64-Core 604
41% 604 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$719
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2808 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Lighting 554
Reflection 512
Parallax 622
146% 563 fps
MRender 263
Gravity 530
Splatting 285
138% 359 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 137%
Great: 145%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$75
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1230 398 399 396 398 401 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 2301
Write 2,215
Mixed 1,399
SusWrite 537
360% 1,613 MB/s
4K Read 49.3
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 74.2
242% 86.9 MB/s
DQ Read 600
DQ Write 996
DQ Mixed 76.9
262% 558 MB/s
Poor: 163%
This bench: 236%
Great: 287%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$75
316GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 262 255 268 350 307 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 376
Write 210
Mixed 242
SusWrite 314
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 87.4
4K Mixed 19.3
90% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 12.7
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 179
108% 110 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 131%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$63
640GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 171 172 172 172 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 138
Write 132
Mixed 27.2
SusWrite 171
84% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 2.2
387% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
77.6% Very good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 22.6
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 30.1
SC Mixed 23.8
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 104%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 3,251 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 138%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $1,015
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $165Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $196Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $54
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $36Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback