Asus TUF B360-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 118% UFO	Desktop 101% UFO	Workstation 101% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	254% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B360-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180914
Uptime	1.5 Days
Run Date	May 15 '19 at 12:04
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600K-$155 321,194 User benchmarks, average bench 93% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	97.7% Outstanding	Memory 92.3 1-Core 144 2-Core 288 96% 175 Pts	4-Core 556 8-Core 790 84% 673 Pts	64-Core 806 50% 806 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 97.7% Great: 103%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Nvidia(10DE 1E87) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.64 Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	120% Outstanding	Lighting 163 Reflection 157 Parallax 157 133% 159 fps	MRender 179 Gravity 144 Splatting 101 111% 141 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 383GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 953 1151 866 816 815 817 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	254% Outstanding	Read 1,180 Write 1,024 Mixed 989 SusWrite 903 230% 1,024 MB/s	4K Read 62.1 4K Write 134 4K Mixed 83.9 273% 93.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1,614 DQ Write 1,401 DQ Mixed 1,460 1,107% 1,492 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 254% Great: 355%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 32GB 184 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 29GB free, PID a838 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 24 15 21 21 20 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	26.7% Poor	Read 117 Write 24.2 Mixed 75.8 SusWrite 18.7 67% 58.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 2.3 146% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 26%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB 51,435 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	78.7% Very good	MC Read 31.8 MC Write 27.9 MC Mixed 22.7 78% 27.5 GB/s	SC Read 18.7 SC Write 32.9 SC Mixed 24.8 73% 25.5 GB/s	Latency 63.5 63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 78.7% Great: 108%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B360-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 2,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360-PLUS GAMING - $105

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	537x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	254x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	251x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	217x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	146x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	105x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	90x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	84x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	45x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	127x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	72x
BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FD 2x8GBCrucialBench 82%, 12,603 samples	54x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $634

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16