Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results


Gaming 124% UFO	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 154% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	139% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	260% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF X299 MARK 1 (all builds)
Memory	61 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190214
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 15 '19 at 05:19
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7980XE-$1,511 4,653 User benchmarks, average bench 80% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	87% Excellent	Memory 80 1-Core 130 2-Core 241 84% 150 Pts	4-Core 504 8-Core 984 88% 744 Pts	64-Core 2680 166% 2680 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 87% Great: 95%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6593) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	139% Outstanding	Lighting 208 Reflection 186 Parallax 183 170% 193 fps	MRender 118 Gravity 162 Splatting 118 108% 133 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 139% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249 18,356 User benchmarks, average bench 279% 872GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1468 1438 1455 1428 1424 1417 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	260% Outstanding	Read 1,665 Write 1,535 Mixed 876 SusWrite 1,438 309% 1,378 MB/s	4K Read 39 4K Write 146 4K Mixed 52.8 204% 79.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,065 DQ Write 886 DQ Mixed 945 716% 965 MB/s
Poor: 168% ↑ This bench: 260% Great: 363%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78 5,594 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 5.5TB free Firmware: FS2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 200 205 200 201 205 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 58% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB 72 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	104% Outstanding	MC Read 34.7 MC Write 53.6 MC Mixed 36.3 119% 41.5 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 21.5 SC Mixed 11 39% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 80.6 50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 189%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 695 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 103%

UFO

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 104%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

CPU
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	179x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	133x
Core i9-7900XIntel $455Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	121x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	81x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	68x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	39x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	37x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	30x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	26x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	40x
Dominator DDR4 2800 C16 8x4GBCorsairBench 113%, 223 samples	19x
F4 DDR4 4000 C15 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 115%, 708 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $1,131

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16